Social Cohesion v The People

Wednesday, 15th of October 2025

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Lawful Formal Challenge to the Jurisdiction of all purported courts in the Commonwealth of Australia, the authority of all the changed State Constitutions, the evidence that the Federal Parliament was Lawfully established and the authority of the High Court after the unlawful 1979 High Court Act.Show more I, .............of the family........... of ................................

On the 9th of July 1900, under the authority of 63 & 64 Victoria, the

Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK was Proclaimed as the

Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK as an enabling act to establish the Commonwealth Constitution and enable the six colonies to become states of a self-governing colony of England.

The nine clauses were added by Queen Victoria to clarify how the Constitution must work and the application of its authority.

Each state constitution was put in place by Letters Patent in their original text as was a Letters Patent for the office of governor.

Western Australia failed to comply with clause seven of the enabling act and the constitution derived from it.

Western Australian colony passed the 1899 Constitutional Alteration Act ignoring the provisions of clause seven of Our Constitution.

That act was wiped out with as having no authority, by the interpreters of the constitution, being the framers under section 51 ss 38 of the enabling act and its Lawful Interpretation.

That section denotes that if land control was not granted by section 51, then it did not exist in law. That section applied to all other laws.

The true definition of Fee Simple is law in this country under the 9 Clauses to the Constitution, it read as follows.

The origin of a Grant in Fee Simple Title The Abolition of Tenures Act 1600.

- In 1600, The Crown at that time King Charles II, could no longer afford the upkeep of land and services to his subjects therefore he abolished old tenures and allowed a statute law to be enacted for the sale of the lands of the Crown.

- The officers of the Crown had then to make entries in the register of lots. The Title Deed that ensued carried a volume number, folio number and the lot numbers.

- A Grant in Fee Simple Title Deed.

- All land in Australia was sold into private hands through a Grant in Fee Simple Title. The new owner of this Title is required to hold a Deed.

- The Original Deeds were signed by the Governor of the State after first determining that all purchase monies had been paid.

“Now know ye that for and consideration of the said sum for and on our behalf well and truly paid into the Treasury of our said State before these presents are issued and of all and singular the premises, we have granted and for us our heirs and successors do hereby grant unto the said (name) heirs and assigns – subject nevertheless to the several and respective reservations hereinafter contained that We do Reserve unto Us Our Heirs and Successors all minerals.”

The Governor signed,

“In witness whereof I have hereunto signed my name and affixed my Seal.”

This then, is a very Lawful Instrument of Law, a Contract with not just with the Crown via the Seal, but with the actual Sovereign Majesty, his/her Heirs and Successors.

This instrument is a Deed in Trust with the current King Charles III as the Successor to the Crown; it is a Trust in Inheritance and a Trust in inheritance and a trust in Equity. That means that the act of purchase of a Grant in Fee Simple Title carries the right to pass on the estate through an Inheritance, a right protected by our Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK.

A trust in equity is the purchaser’s right to retain his equity (equality)of value in his land. So, when the Federal Parliament requires the resumption of the land, the Crown has sold, it must be under Just Terms Compensation.

There are 4 elements of Ownership that are carried in a Fee Simple Title Deed.

1. The purchase of any structures or buildings on the

land – tenements.

2. The right to build any structures of any kind on the

land – messuages.

3. The right of ownership of all natural elements on the land,

to an indefinite extent above the land, and to the very centre

of the earth – corporeal hereditaments.

4. The right to use the land in any manner including to waste

the land. (Waste being Lawful term to take back to bare rock

or destroy) – incorporeal hereditaments.

The rights Do Not include:

1. Ownership of any water on the land as water cannot be owned,

as it is moveable. You have only the use of the water while

it is on the land.

2. The right to injure a neighbour’s enjoyment and use

of his property.

3. The right to trespass on another’s land without his permission.

Proprietorship of a Grant in Fee Simple Title.

This is the Lawful term of Our Ownership. We are Proprietors of

Fee Simple Grant. Which means we operate the Title during the period of Our Ownership. Our Proprietary Rights are often called “Natural Rights.”

We hold a Proprieties Plena – Full Property, including not only the Title, but the usufruct, or exclusive right to the use.

Our Grant in Fee Simple Title Deed lists the new owner as a Tenant in Common.

This refers to the fact that we share on interest with the Crown through the reservation of the minerals. However, the only right the Crown reserves is that listed on the Title Deed. There is no authority over land by any parliament purporting to be a government.

More importantly, we can never own Our Land under a Torrens Title, because it does not and never will allow for the ability to inherit, a right which is guaranteed by the King, His, Heirs and Successors.

To replace Common law system Titles (i.e. Fee Simple) with Torrens Title is, in effect, the theft of Our Ownership Rights by parliamentary legislation.

The Abolition of Tenures Act 1600

“Alienation of land – Charles II AD 1600

IV and be it further enacted by the authority, aforesaid that all tenures hereafter to be created by the King’s majesty, His, Heirs and Successors, upon any gifts or grants of any, manors, land, tenements or hereditaments of any estate of inheritance at the Common Law, shall be in force and common socage only, and not by knights service or in capite and shall be discharged of all wardship, value and forfeiture of marriage, livery, primer siesin, ouster-le-main, aide pur fair fitz Chivalier and pur file marrier; and law, stature, or reservation to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding.”

Free and common socage only – tells us we do not have any debts attached to our land once we purchase it. Regardless of any purported law, statute or reservation to the contrary.

Land held of the Crown in Fee Simple may be assured in Fee Simple without licence and without fine and the person taking under the assurance shall hold the land of the Crown in the same manner as the land was held before the assurance took effect.

12 Charles II c 24 – The Tenures Abolition Act 1660 – s 4. 37 Tenure.

“All tenures created by the Crown by way of the alienation of an

estate in fee simple shall be taken to be in free and common socage without any incident of tenure for the benefit of the Crown.”

This Act is Australian Law under Our Constitution and duplicates the Abolition of Tenures Act 1660 in stating we buy (take) and are assured (guaranteed) Our Land free of any debts.

Alienation means to Lawfully transfer title to property in Real Property Law.

With no incidence of tenure means the Crown has no holding or occupying right over the land.

The reason being is you have no control of the people on their land until you prove jurisdiction and authority.

As you are aware the Constitution Stands as Supreme Law, and you have several huge issues since Western Australia never put its Lawful State Constitution 1889 in place at Federation.

Until that happens, there has never been nor can be a Lawful Federal Parliament.

It must be noted that,

“The Supreme, Absolute and Uncontrollable

Authority Remains with The People."

Page 286 of the Annotated Constitution being the interpretation by the framers of the constitution (Red Book) the Only Lawful Interpretation.

Section 107, 108 and 109 established the states after the Proclamation of the Commonwealth Constitution on the 1st of January 1901.

The Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK, the Commonwealth

Constitution 1901, the office of governors, the office of Governor General was put in place by Letters Patent on the 29th of October 1900.

Under British Law, all alterations to Letters Patent must be signed off by the Monarch, the Colonial Laws Validity Act refers.

The Annotated Constitution (Red Book) clearly states,

“Even if that act had never been enacted,

no colony of England can interfere with an Imperial Act.”

It is clear Western Australia never put its Lawful State Constitution in place leaving it without legislative authority contrary to 106 of the Constitution.

New South Wales removed its State Constitution in August 1902 contrary to 106 of Our Constitution.

Queensland removed its Upper House negating its State Constitution contrary to section 106 of Our Constitution.

South Australia and Tasmania removed and replaced their State Constitutions, contrary to section 106 of Our Constitution.

Victoria removed its State Constitution and replaced it in 1975, therefore negating its constitution, contrary to section 106 of Our Constitution.

Because Western Australia never put its Lawful State Constitution in place at Federation, there were only 5 of the 6 Lawful States established.

Meaning there was no Lawful Federal Parliament, as that was establish by the representatives of the six states not five.

The purported local government act of 1979 and all purported laws made pursuant to it, was added to Unlawful State Constitutions making them Void in Law.

Chapter III of the Constitution states.

“If you exercise authority throughout the Commonwealth, you are required to show where in the constitution that authority comes from.”

I require every purported court, lawyer, magistrate, judge and police, explain where they obtain their authority from in the constitution?

In 1999 there was a purported referendum for a republic in an attempt to hide the fact of the Treason, Treachery and Sabotage including Fraud on the Commonwealth which is The People. It was refused by The People.

The issues I have raised are breaches of the State Constitutions, Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900 UK and Our Commonwealth Constitution 1901 as Proclaimed and Gazetted.

I have attached copies of the unlawful state constitution of Western Australia and the Western Australian Constitution being a Lawful Letters Patent.

Until all the six state constitutions are put back in place, we can never have a Lawful Federal Parliament.

We had lawful local governments prior to federation; they were each separate parliaments of each colony that were local governments created by the Colonial Laws Validity Act as subordinate parliaments of Great Britain.

The local government of each, created state is the state parliaments established by their new constitutions by Letters Patent.

There is no third tier of government in the Commonwealth of Australia.

Municipal authorities are government departments set up to look after roads,

parks, footpaths, libraries, they have no grant of authority, therefore, no grant of power.

None of this challenge can be dealt with in the Commonwealth due to the fact that the 1979 Act removed the separation of powers both state and federal and the rules of the High Court negated all courts as all courts are part of a Federal Judicial system with the High Court at its summit.

The People are restrained by the change to the Commonwealth Constitution Act by the 1979 purported act which requires “We the People” to seek special leave to appeal instead of leave to appeal.

The rules of the court are used for registrars to fraudulently carry out judicial decisions without Constitutional Authority.

I respectfully state that you contact Andrew Rosendell from The House of Commons, who leads the committee that took over the Privy Council.

The Challenge raises issues of Blatant Treason and war on the Throne of England, clearly a decision of England as there are no lawful courts in this country.

No decision in relation to the current matter can be made until all the above entities prove their jurisdiction.

Dated: October 2025

of the family

Witness:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

See the attach pdf on few groups page links bellows;

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1WkEHzM7zS/

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1D7YPxkufD/

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1A3UsbA8SA/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BjSeVYsum/ Show less