If you’re among the tiny minority vested in confronting your unchallenged beliefs in order to evolve your consciousness, then I have a treat for you.
The following excerpt extracted from a conversation between Neil Oliver and Doc Malik, exposes the programmed interpretation of democracy versus its true, tyranny-dismembering nature, indirectly revealing why the document claiming to be the 1901 Australian Constitution is an institutionalised crime of epic proportions.
These insights also explain why the principles of common law enshrined within Magna Carta 1215 form the immutable foundations of a legitimate constitution. These principles scribed on parchment paper lie dormant, waiting for human consciousness to evolve into recognising that they provide the moral framework for developing responsible, trustworthy individuals capable of extinguishing the conditions that invite parasitic predators to dominate through fraud and organised violent force.
Below is a brief summary of the contents of the conversation:

1. Tyranny institutionalised as normality
A parliament that grants itself the right to make edicts that defile inherent individual rights, passes them into statute and then imposes punishments for disobedience whilst making itself unaccountable for malicious intent, does not serve, it dominates by fraud and force. Its cunning lies in convincing the controlled that their submission is freedom and their obedience, virtue.

2. The escalation of organised malicious intent
The political party system did not emerge to represent the people but to subjugate them. Conceived in deceit within the 1688 Bill of Rights, it institutionalised manipulation and exploitation cloaked in the illusion of service to the people. It refined the art of domination by rewarding obedience while masking the moral bankruptcy of the collective as civic participation.

3. Implied consent, tyranny’s invisible contract
The doctrine of implied consent is the masterpiece of psychological warfare. It grants impunity to the use of coercion to secure submission whilst simultaneously defining coerced submission as agreement and ignorance as complicity. This religious doctrine claiming the authority of law, operates from a superstition that its possible to transfer the karmic burden onto the submissive ignorant masses for collaborating with their enslavement under duress while believing obedience is virtuous.

4. The engineering of majority consensus as consent
The introduction of referendums was the next cunning trap set by the predator class. It exploits the herd instinct to belong at any cost through the seductive promise of safety. The predator class weaponise the unconscious majority, exploiting the seduction of self-righteousness as a means to impose their collective will upon the morally awake minority while believing themselves virtuous for doing so. It is the most refined form of tyranny: mass enforcement through self-deception.

5. Magna Carta 1215, the erased declaration of sovereignty
Magna Carta did not grant rights; it recognised the immutable law that conscience stands above decree back by violence. Trial by jury affirms the authority of moral integrity over delegated responsibilities attributed to office holders, protecting the individual from the moral corruption born of the insatiable appetite to rule by manipulating the herd instinct.

6. The immutable law of truth
Lies and wrongdoings cannot become truth or right simply because the majority accept and participate in them. The tragedy of humanity is not deception itself but the refusal to recognise its seductive power and take personal responsibility to acknowledge and transcend it. Succumbing to the allure of the herd instinct that promises safety in numbers is to conflate consensus with truth and conformity with virtue. The reclamation of sovereignty begins when the courage of conscience replaces the denial born of fear.